Burma: The Notion of Responsibility to Protect Versus Non-Interferece
Burma: The Notion of Responsibility to Protect Versus Non-Interferece
By: Sai Wansai
The only way to stop this "reign of terror"
and tyrannical rule in Burma is a full scale humanitarian intervention. Where have all the noises of
"responsibility to protect", which unofficially have been endorsed by
almost all democratic countries gone?
It is quite clear that the UN Security Council cannot undertake any such
intervention, where China for fear of exposing its gross
human rights violations and Russia, which is struggling hard to bounce back as a third world champion of Cold War
days, wield veto power and has also make use it to protect the Burmese junta.
And so it is left to the EU and US to build necessary consensus to physically
protect this crime against humanity.
As it is, the US might have
played all its cards and none left to bet on Burma, according to a number of
vocal and concerned opinion-makers . But many, especially the suffering and
oppressed people of Burma,
think the US, with the solid backing of EU, could pull this show, with a much
smaller investment than in Iraq and Afghanistan, where a hugh profit could be
reaped, in kind of riding moral high horse, standing tall and feeling good to
have championed the cause of all mankind.
The people of Burma
has risen up many times, only to be crushed by the military. And no one could
blame them for not doing enough for freedom and restoration of democracy.
Just as the Germans were not able to get rid of Hitler and his Nazi
regime in pre-war days on their own and Allied forces had to come to their
rescue, the people of Burma,
urgently need the same type of help from international community.
Anything less than this would mean
the continuation of tyrannical rule indefinitely.
Furthermore, the so-called “non-interference” notion should be only valid for
countries, which adhere to democratic principle, where the ruling government
protects and look after its citizens and not that is slaughtering and harming
the populace.
As such, the military junta of Burma cannot be granted the privilege and treatment with internationally accepted
norm of “non-interference” of a sovereign state.
It is now up to the West in general to let Burma sinks further into the deep
hole of Darfur-like tragedy and live with guilty consciousness or pull all its
moral strength to right the wrong, restore justice, human right and democracy.
The author is General Secretary
of the Shan Democratic Union (SDU) – Editor

